<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The future of science and religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleerly.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/the-future-of-science-and-religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleerly.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/the-future-of-science-and-religion/</link>
	<description>Random thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:06:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Diatribical Idiot</title>
		<link>http://cleerly.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/the-future-of-science-and-religion/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Diatribical Idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleerly.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/the-future-of-science-and-religion/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>If you have to ask, then you don&#039;t understand faith.  And why should the mechanism by which God chooses to provide consciousness have anything to do with it?  This is, in my own opinion, philosophical tripe meant to once again declare that God is dead because some scientific advance proposes to explain something it is not explaining.

In short, to answer your question, absolutely.  if my faith were so weak to suggest otherwise, it would be no faith at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have to ask, then you don&#8217;t understand faith.  And why should the mechanism by which God chooses to provide consciousness have anything to do with it?  This is, in my own opinion, philosophical tripe meant to once again declare that God is dead because some scientific advance proposes to explain something it is not explaining.</p>
<p>In short, to answer your question, absolutely.  if my faith were so weak to suggest otherwise, it would be no faith at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: finchley81</title>
		<link>http://cleerly.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/the-future-of-science-and-religion/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>finchley81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 04:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleerly.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/the-future-of-science-and-religion/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Will your faith be so strong when consciousness is shown to be a quantum interaction in the brain? I wonder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will your faith be so strong when consciousness is shown to be a quantum interaction in the brain? I wonder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diatribical Idiot</title>
		<link>http://cleerly.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/the-future-of-science-and-religion/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Diatribical Idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 04:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleerly.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/the-future-of-science-and-religion/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Faith has no challenge ahead of it.  It has challengers to it.

This is nothing new, nor will it ever change - at least in this world.

Those with faith have no reason to fear science.  Indeed, my own faith has only been strengthened by the wonders of Creation uncovered through the scientific realm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faith has no challenge ahead of it.  It has challengers to it.</p>
<p>This is nothing new, nor will it ever change &#8211; at least in this world.</p>
<p>Those with faith have no reason to fear science.  Indeed, my own faith has only been strengthened by the wonders of Creation uncovered through the scientific realm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
